Institution record
EVEREST
Myrtle Ltd
- Source score
- 5.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | Not supplied | Regulated | MYRTLE LTD | 2021-05-05 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for EVEREST and other records in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVEREST (this record) | Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
MISASVG FSAVFSC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.1 | 0 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 3.7 | 0 | |
KASFSCACNV+12 | 15 / 15 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
EVEREST: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is EVEREST's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 1 licence entry associated with EVEREST (legal entity reference: Myrtle Ltd); 1 are labelled "regulated" and 1 are labelled regulated or registered: Financial Services Commission, Mauritius — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official Financial Services Commission, Mauritius public register.
Which of EVEREST's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues. 1 of EVEREST's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: Financial Services Commission, Mauritius (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: MYRTLE LTD). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is EVEREST's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
EVEREST carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to EVEREST's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with EVEREST (listed execution software: MT4, MT5), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Financial Services Commission, Mauritius.