1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
EVEREST vs Xtreme Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of EVEREST (Myrtle Ltd) and Xtreme Markets (Xtreme Markets Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
EVEREST and Xtreme Markets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, EVEREST holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Xtreme Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | EVEREST | Xtreme Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | EVEREST |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | EVEREST |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: EVEREST vs Xtreme Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | EVEREST | Xtreme Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Myrtle Ltd | Xtreme Markets Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Financial Services Commission, Mauritius: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 602, 6th Floor, Hennessy Tower, Pope Hennessy Street, Port-Louis, Republic of Mauritius | Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshal Islands – MH96960。 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot metals, Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare EVEREST and Xtreme Markets against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: EVEREST vs Xtreme Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: EVEREST or Xtreme Markets?
Both EVEREST and Xtreme Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, EVEREST maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Xtreme Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between EVEREST and Xtreme Markets?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), EVEREST records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Xtreme Markets at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do EVEREST and Xtreme Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
EVEREST lists Spot metals, Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Xtreme Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: EVEREST or Xtreme Markets?
EVEREST carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Xtreme Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.