1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs TrioMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and TrioMarkets (EDR FINANCIAL LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
TrioMarkets outranks Magic Compass by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.7)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TrioMarkets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | TrioMarkets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 7.0 | +0.3 | TrioMarkets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 6.0 | +1.8 | TrioMarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 7.0 | +0.2 | TrioMarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | TrioMarkets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs TrioMarkets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | TrioMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | EDR FINANCIAL LIMITED |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | 11, Grigori Afxentiou Street, Imperio Centro Building, Office 301, 4003 Limassol |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Chinese, French, Italian, Russian, Spanish and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and TrioMarkets against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs TrioMarkets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or TrioMarkets?
Both Magic Compass and TrioMarkets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TrioMarkets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and TrioMarkets?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with TrioMarkets at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Magic Compass and TrioMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while TrioMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or TrioMarkets?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TrioMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.