1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Checkout vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Checkout (Checkout) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Magic Compass outranks Checkout by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Checkout holds 6 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Checkout | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.7 | +1.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.2 | +0.8 | Checkout |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.8 | +1.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Checkout vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Checkout | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Checkout | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 6 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Wenlock Works Shepherdess Walk London, N1 7BQ United Kingdom | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Payment processing, risk control, fund management | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Chinese, Japanese, German, French, Spanish and 10 languages | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Checkout and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Checkout vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Checkout or Magic Compass?
Checkout holds more active regulated filings (6 vs 1). Specifically, Checkout maintains 6 total recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of the UAE, FMA, Financial Conduct Authority, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Checkout and Magic Compass?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Checkout records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Checkout and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Checkout lists Payment processing, risk control, fund management with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Checkout or Magic Compass?
Checkout carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.