1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Binance vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Binance (Binance) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Magic Compass outranks Binance by +6.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, Binance holds 15 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 15 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Binance | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | — | 6.7 | +6.7 | Magic Compass (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | — | 4.2 | +4.2 | Magic Compass (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Binance |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | — | 0.0 | +0.0 | Magic Compass (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | — | 6.8 | +6.8 | Magic Compass (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | — | 5.0 | +5.0 | Magic Compass (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Binance vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Binance | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Binance | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 15 regulated / 15 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | One Letterman Drive, Building C, Suite C3-800 The Presidio of San Francisco New York City, CA 94129 | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Binance | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Binance and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Binance vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Binance or Magic Compass?
Binance holds more active regulated filings (15 vs 1). Specifically, Binance maintains 15 total recorded filing(s) (KAS, FSCA, CNV, CNAD) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Binance and Magic Compass?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Binance records an Overall Score of — (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Binance and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Binance lists general financial services with execution software [Binance], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Binance or Magic Compass?
Binance carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.