Institution record
AUS GLOBAL
AUS Global MU Limited
- Source score
- 7.1
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities and Commodities Authority | 20200000207 | Registered | AUS GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | 2024-06-04 | |
Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 000427848 | Regulated | AUS GLOBAL FINANCIAL (AU) PTY. LTD | 2012-10-12 | |
FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS | 350/17 | Regulated | AC Markets (Europe) Ltd | 2017-11-12 | |
Financial Sector Conduct Authority | 52171 | Registered | AUS GLOBAL ZA (PTY) LTD | 2022-03-11 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | GB23201412 | Regulated | AUS Global MU Ltd | 20/04/2023 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for AUS GLOBAL and other records in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUS GLOBAL (this record) | SCAASICCyFO+2 | 3 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 7.1 | 0 |
FINRAGFSCFinancial Services Regulatory Authority, Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM FSRA)+5 | 6 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.5 | 0 | |
MISASVG FSAVFSC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
CYSECFinancial Services Authority SeychellesBVIFSC+2 | 3 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
VFSCASICFinancial Conduct Authority+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.6 | 0 | |
VFSCASICSVG FSA+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
AUS GLOBAL: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is AUS GLOBAL's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 5 licence entries associated with AUS GLOBAL (legal entity reference: AUS Global MU Limited); 3 are labelled "regulated" and 5 are labelled regulated or registered: SCA (Securities and Commodities Authority) — licence 20200000207, status: registered; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 000427848, status: regulated; CyFO (FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS) — licence 350/17, status: regulated; FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 52171, status: registered; Financial Services Commission, Mauritius — licence GB23201412, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official SCA, ASIC, CyFO public register.
Which of AUS GLOBAL's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is AUS GLOBAL's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
AUS GLOBAL carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 7.1, risk & licensing: 7.0, brand: 6.9, market influence: 7.3, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to AUS GLOBAL's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with AUS GLOBAL (listed execution software: AUS GLOBAL cTrader, MT4, MT5), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SCA.