1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Pintu vs TrioMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Pintu (Pintu) and TrioMarkets (EDR FINANCIAL LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
TrioMarkets outranks Pintu by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Pintu holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TrioMarkets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Pintu | TrioMarkets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 | TrioMarkets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | TrioMarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | TrioMarkets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 | TrioMarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 | TrioMarkets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Pintu vs TrioMarkets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Pintu | TrioMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Pintu | EDR FINANCIAL LIMITED |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | OJK: Not suppliedCommodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | The City Tower, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.81, RT.1/RW.6, Dukuh Atas, Menteng, Jakarta, Indonesia | 11, Grigori Afxentiou Street, Imperio Centro Building, Office 301, 4003 Limassol |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Futures | Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Chinese, French, Italian, Russian, Spanish and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Pintu and TrioMarkets against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Pintu vs TrioMarkets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Pintu or TrioMarkets?
Both Pintu and TrioMarkets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Pintu maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (OJK, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TrioMarkets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Pintu and TrioMarkets?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Pintu records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with TrioMarkets at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Pintu and TrioMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Pintu lists Cryptocurrencies, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while TrioMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Pintu or TrioMarkets?
Pintu carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TrioMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.