1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
easyMarkets vs Pintu: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of easyMarkets (EASYMARKETS PTY LTD) and Pintu (Pintu) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
easyMarkets outranks Pintu by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, easyMarkets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Pintu holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | easyMarkets | Pintu | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | easyMarkets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | easyMarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | easyMarkets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | easyMarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | easyMarkets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: easyMarkets vs Pintu
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | easyMarkets | Pintu |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | EASYMARKETS PTY LTD | Pintu |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | OJK: Not suppliedCommodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CT House,Office No.8F,Providence, Mahe, Seychelles。 | The City Tower, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.81, RT.1/RW.6, Dukuh Atas, Menteng, Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Other regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Polish, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare easyMarkets and Pintu against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: easyMarkets vs Pintu
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: easyMarkets or Pintu?
easyMarkets holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, easyMarkets maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, BVIFSC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Pintu maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (OJK, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between easyMarkets and Pintu?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), easyMarkets records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Pintu at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do easyMarkets and Pintu differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
easyMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5], while Pintu lists Cryptocurrencies, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: easyMarkets or Pintu?
easyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pintu carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.