1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Inter Pan vs Pintu: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) and Pintu (Pintu) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Inter Pan outranks Pintu by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Pintu holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Inter Pan | Pintu | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Inter Pan vs Pintu
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Inter Pan | Pintu |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES | Pintu |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | OJK: Not suppliedCommodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610. | The City Tower, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.81, RT.1/RW.6, Dukuh Atas, Menteng, Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, multiple side | Cryptocurrencies, Futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Inter Pan and Pintu against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Inter Pan vs Pintu
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Inter Pan or Pintu?
Inter Pan holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Inter Pan maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Pintu maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (OJK, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Inter Pan and Pintu?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Inter Pan records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Pintu at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Inter Pan and Pintu differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5], while Pintu lists Cryptocurrencies, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Inter Pan or Pintu?
Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pintu carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.