1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
HashKey Exchange vs Pintu: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of HashKey Exchange (HashKey Exchange) and Pintu (Pintu) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
HashKey Exchange outranks Pintu by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, HashKey Exchange holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Pintu holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | HashKey Exchange | Pintu | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | HashKey Exchange |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | HashKey Exchange |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | HashKey Exchange |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | HashKey Exchange |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | HashKey Exchange |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: HashKey Exchange vs Pintu
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | HashKey Exchange | Pintu |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | HashKey Exchange | Pintu |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | SFC: #BOP237MAS: Not supplied | OJK: Not suppliedCommodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI): Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hong Kong, China | The City Tower, Jl. M.H. Thamrin No.81, RT.1/RW.6, Dukuh Atas, Menteng, Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Cryptocurrencies, Futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare HashKey Exchange and Pintu against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: HashKey Exchange vs Pintu
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: HashKey Exchange or Pintu?
HashKey Exchange holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, HashKey Exchange maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (SFC, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Pintu maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (OJK, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between HashKey Exchange and Pintu?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), HashKey Exchange records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Pintu at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do HashKey Exchange and Pintu differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
HashKey Exchange lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Pintu lists Cryptocurrencies, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: HashKey Exchange or Pintu?
HashKey Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pintu carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.