Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BitMart vs Make Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BitMart (BitMart) and Make Capital (Make Capital Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bitmart-vs-make-capital

BitMart outranks Make Capital by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, BitMart holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Make Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBitMartMake CapitalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.04.0+2.0BitMart
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.04.0+2.0BitMart
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0BitMart
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0BitMart
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0BitMart

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BitMart vs Make Capital

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BitMart vs Make Capital
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BitMart and Make Capital.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBitMartMake Capital
Primary Legal NameBitMartMake Capital Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Addresscayman islandsArtemis House 76 Fort Street Grand Cayman, KY1-1111 Cayman Islands
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment productsCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Metals
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Vietnamese, English, Japanese, RussianChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Indonesian, English, Japanese
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BitMart and Make Capital against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BitMart vs Make Capital

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BitMart or Make Capital?

Make Capital holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, BitMart maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Make Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSCA, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BitMart and Make Capital?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BitMart records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Make Capital at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do BitMart and Make Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BitMart lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Make Capital lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BitMart or Make Capital?

BitMart carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Make Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BitMart vs Make Capital (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger