Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Binance vs Make Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Binance (Binance) and Make Capital (Make Capital Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: binance-2807-vs-make-capital

Make Capital outranks Binance by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs —)

On supervisory breadth, Binance holds 15 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 15 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Make Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBinanceMake CapitalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite—4.0+4.0Make Capital (Recorded)
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight—4.0+4.0Make Capital (Recorded)
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0Binance
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight—0.0+0.0Make Capital (Recorded)
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight—4.0+4.0Make Capital (Recorded)
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight—4.0+4.0Make Capital (Recorded)

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Binance vs Make Capital

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Binance vs Make Capital
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Binance and Make Capital.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBinanceMake Capital
Primary Legal NameBinanceMake Capital Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings15 regulated / 15 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressOne Letterman Drive, Building C, Suite C3-800 The Presidio of San Francisco New York City, CA 94129Artemis House 76 Fort Street Grand Cayman, KY1-1111 Cayman Islands
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Metals
Execution Software & TerminalsBinanceMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Indonesian, English, Japanese
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Binance and Make Capital against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Binance vs Make Capital

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Binance or Make Capital?

Binance holds more active regulated filings (15 vs 2). Specifically, Binance maintains 15 total recorded filing(s) (KAS, FSCA, CNV, CNAD) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Make Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (FSCA, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Binance and Make Capital?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Binance records an Overall Score of — (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Make Capital at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Binance and Make Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Binance lists general financial services with execution software [Binance], while Make Capital lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Binance or Make Capital?

Binance carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Make Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Binance vs Make Capital (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger