Institution record
BitGo
- Source score
- 6.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage New York State Department of Financial Services | Not supplied | Regulated | BitGo New York Trust Company, LLC | — | |
In our coverage Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 31000292337298 | Regulated | BitGo Trust Company, Inc. | 2025-02-07 | |
In our coverage Monetary Authority of Singapore | Not supplied | Regulated | BITGO SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. | 2024-08 | |
In our coverage Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | 50085544 / 157322 | Regulated | BitGo Europe GmbH | — |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for BitGo and other records in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BitGo (this record) | NYSDFSFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)MAS+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
SECSecurities Investor Protection Corporation (U.S. SIPC)+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.3 | 0 | |
VFSCASICSVG FSA+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
AUSTRACFinancial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.1 | 0 | |
BMAFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)SEC+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 0 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
BitGo: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is BitGo's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 4 licence entries associated with BitGo (legal entity reference: BitGo); 4 are labelled "regulated" and 4 are labelled regulated or registered: NYSDFS (New York State Department of Financial Services) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — licence 31000292337298, status: regulated; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence 50085544 / 157322, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official NYSDFS, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), MAS public register.
Which of BitGo's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues. 4 of BitGo's 4 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: NYSDFS (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: BitGo New York Trust Company, LLC); Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) (licence 31000292337298, regulated, entity: BitGo Trust Company, Inc.); MAS (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: BITGO SINGAPORE PTE. LTD.); BaFin (licence 50085544 / 157322, regulated, entity: BitGo Europe GmbH). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is BitGo's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
BitGo carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 6.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 6.0, market influence: 6.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to BitGo's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with BitGo, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to NYSDFS.