1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Rooster Protocol vs ST Market: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Rooster Protocol (Rooster Protocol) and ST Market (STMarket Company Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Rooster Protocol and ST Market are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Rooster Protocol holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ST Market holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Rooster Protocol | ST Market | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Rooster Protocol vs ST Market
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Rooster Protocol | ST Market |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Rooster Protocol | STMarket Company Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | #23th floors, Amass Tower, Room 2301, St63 corner 282, Phum 6, Boeng Keng Kang Muoy, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh. AMASS Tower, Street 63, Phum 6, Chamkar Mon, Boeng Keng Kang Mouy, Phnom Penh, 12302, Cambodia 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Decentralised trading | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Metals, Energies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Rooster Protocol and ST Market against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Rooster Protocol vs ST Market
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Rooster Protocol or ST Market?
Both Rooster Protocol and ST Market hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Rooster Protocol maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ST Market maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Rooster Protocol and ST Market?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Rooster Protocol records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with ST Market at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Rooster Protocol and ST Market differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Rooster Protocol lists Decentralised trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ST Market lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Rooster Protocol or ST Market?
Rooster Protocol carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ST Market carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.