1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
QA Trading vs WINGO: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of QA Trading (QA TRADING LTD) and WINGO (Wingo Group LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
WINGO outranks QA Trading by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, QA Trading holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas WINGO holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | QA Trading | WINGO | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.4 | 2.0 | +0.6 | WINGO |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.4 | 2.0 | +0.6 | WINGO |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | WINGO |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 2.0 | +0.6 | WINGO |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 2.0 | +0.6 | WINGO |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: QA Trading vs WINGO
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | QA Trading | WINGO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | QA TRADING LTD | Wingo Group LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | Number 6, Vasili Vryonides str., Gala court chambers, 5th floor, office 503, Limassol 3095 Bonovo road, Fomboni, Island of Mohéli, Comoros Union |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare QA Trading and WINGO against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: QA Trading vs WINGO
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: QA Trading or WINGO?
Both QA Trading and WINGO hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, QA Trading maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (MISA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas WINGO maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), MISA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between QA Trading and WINGO?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), QA Trading records an Overall Score of 1.4 (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with WINGO at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do QA Trading and WINGO differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
QA Trading lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while WINGO lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: QA Trading or WINGO?
QA Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while WINGO carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.