1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Project 0xD38 vs RCP Swap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Project 0xD38 (Project 0xD38) and RCP Swap (RCP Swap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Project 0xD38 and RCP Swap are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Project 0xD38 holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RCP Swap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Project 0xD38 | RCP Swap | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Project 0xD38 vs RCP Swap
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Project 0xD38 | RCP Swap |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Project 0xD38 | RCP Swap |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | NFT | Decentralised trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Project 0xD38 and RCP Swap against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Project 0xD38 vs RCP Swap
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Project 0xD38 or RCP Swap?
Both Project 0xD38 and RCP Swap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Project 0xD38 maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RCP Swap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Project 0xD38 and RCP Swap?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Project 0xD38 records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with RCP Swap at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Project 0xD38 and RCP Swap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Project 0xD38 lists NFT with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RCP Swap lists Decentralised trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Project 0xD38 or RCP Swap?
Project 0xD38 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RCP Swap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.