Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ProEquityMarkets vs SELFTRADEINV: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ProEquityMarkets (ProEquityMarkets) and SELFTRADEINV (SELFTRADEINV) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: proequitymarkets-vs-selftradeinv

ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, ProEquityMarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SELFTRADEINV holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightProEquityMarketsSELFTRADEINVScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.01.1+0.1SELFTRADEINV
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.01.5+0.5SELFTRADEINV
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ProEquityMarkets vs SELFTRADEINV

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ProEquityMarkets vs SELFTRADEINV
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeProEquityMarketsSELFTRADEINV
Primary Legal NameProEquityMarketsSELFTRADEINV
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressGBBoatmans House, 2 Selsdon Way, London, E14 9LA, United Kingdom
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, FuturesCryptocurrencies, Forex
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ProEquityMarkets vs SELFTRADEINV

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ProEquityMarkets or SELFTRADEINV?

Both ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ProEquityMarkets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SELFTRADEINV maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ProEquityMarkets records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SELFTRADEINV at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.1, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do ProEquityMarkets and SELFTRADEINV differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ProEquityMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SELFTRADEINV lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ProEquityMarkets or SELFTRADEINV?

ProEquityMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SELFTRADEINV carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ProEquityMarkets vs SELFTRADEINV (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger