Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Phillip Nova vs Prodigit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Phillip Nova (Phillip Nova Pte Ltd) and Prodigit (Prodigit Investments Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: phillip-nova-vs-prodigit

Phillip Nova outranks Prodigit by +0.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.8 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, Phillip Nova holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prodigit holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightPhillip NovaProdigitScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.86.0+0.8Phillip Nova
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.87.0+0.2Prodigit
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.85.0+1.8Phillip Nova
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.86.0+0.8Phillip Nova

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Phillip Nova vs Prodigit

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Phillip Nova vs Prodigit
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Phillip Nova and Prodigit.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributePhillip NovaProdigit
Primary Legal NamePhillip Nova Pte LtdProdigit Investments Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
MAS: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address250 North Bridge Road #07-01, Raffles City Tower Singapore 17910160 Vasileos Pavlou, Agios Dometios, 2360 Nicosia, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCFDs, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Indices, Precious Metals, Stocks and ETFsCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Phillip Nova and Prodigit against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Phillip Nova vs Prodigit

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Phillip Nova or Prodigit?

Both Phillip Nova and Prodigit hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Phillip Nova maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prodigit maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Phillip Nova and Prodigit?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Phillip Nova records an Overall Score of 6.8 (Risk & Licensing: 6.8, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 6.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Prodigit at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Phillip Nova and Prodigit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Phillip Nova lists CFDs, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Indices, Precious Metals, Stocks and ETFs with execution software [MT5], while Prodigit lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Phillip Nova or Prodigit?

Phillip Nova carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prodigit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Phillip Nova vs Prodigit (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger