Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

PGM vs Sync Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PGM (PGM) and Sync Markets (Sync Markets LTD.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: pgm-vs-sync-markets

PGM outranks Sync Markets by +0.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.2)

On supervisory breadth, PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sync Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightPGMSync MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.2+0.8PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.04.2+1.8PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.2+0.8PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.04.2+1.8PGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: PGM vs Sync Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: PGM vs Sync Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between PGM and Sync Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributePGMSync Markets
Primary Legal NamePGMSync Markets LTD.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressINP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004L1, 256 Rundle St, Adelaide, SA 5000 / Fortgate Offshore Investment and Legal Services Ltd. Ground Floor, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Saint Lucia / Flat 5, 4th Floor, 27 Penywern Road, SW5 9TT, London, United Kingdom /
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metalsCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, UyghurChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare PGM and Sync Markets against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: PGM vs Sync Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PGM or Sync Markets?

Both PGM and Sync Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, PGM maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sync Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PGM and Sync Markets?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PGM records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Sync Markets at 5.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 5.2, Market Influence: 4.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do PGM and Sync Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Sync Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PGM or Sync Markets?

PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sync Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

PGM vs Sync Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger