Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Mushroom Pixel vs Sardis Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Mushroom Pixel (Mushroom Pixel) and Sardis Global (Sardis Global LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mushroom-pixel-vs-sardis-global

Sardis Global outranks Mushroom Pixel by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.7 vs 1.6)

On supervisory breadth, Mushroom Pixel holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sardis Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMushroom PixelSardis GlobalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.61.7+0.1Sardis Global
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.61.7+0.1Sardis Global
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.61.7+0.1Sardis Global
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.61.7+0.1Sardis Global

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Mushroom Pixel vs Sardis Global

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Mushroom Pixel vs Sardis Global
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Mushroom Pixel and Sardis Global.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMushroom PixelSardis Global
Primary Legal NameMushroom PixelSardis Global LTD
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressInternationalBonovo Road – Fomboni Island of Mohéli – Comoros Union Ulica Vladike Vasariona Borilvica, ulaz H, stan br.3 Podgorica Montenegro 81000
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesNFTCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Mushroom Pixel and Sardis Global against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Mushroom Pixel vs Sardis Global

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Mushroom Pixel or Sardis Global?

Both Mushroom Pixel and Sardis Global hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Mushroom Pixel maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sardis Global maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Mushroom Pixel and Sardis Global?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Mushroom Pixel records an Overall Score of 1.6 (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Sardis Global at 1.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Mushroom Pixel and Sardis Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Mushroom Pixel lists NFT with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sardis Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Mushroom Pixel or Sardis Global?

Mushroom Pixel carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sardis Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Mushroom Pixel vs Sardis Global (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger