Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

MiTRADE vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MiTRADE (Mitrade Global Pty Ltd) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mitrade-vs-pgm

PGM outranks MiTRADE by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, MiTRADE holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMiTRADEPGMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: MiTRADE vs PGM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: MiTRADE vs PGM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between MiTRADE and PGM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMiTRADEPGM
Primary Legal NameMitrade Global Pty LtdPGM
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address215-245 N CHURCH ST, 2ND FLOOR WHITE HALL HOUSE, SUITE #647, 10 MARKET STREET CAMANA BAY, GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, CAYMAN ISLANDSINP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Currency pairs, Indices, StocksFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare MiTRADE and PGM against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: MiTRADE vs PGM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MiTRADE or PGM?

MiTRADE holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, MiTRADE maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MiTRADE and PGM?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MiTRADE records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do MiTRADE and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

MiTRADE lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Currency pairs, Indices, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MiTRADE or PGM?

MiTRADE carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

MiTRADE vs PGM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger