1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Liquiditi Group vs Lunatics: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Liquiditi Group (Liquiditi Group) and Lunatics (Lunatics) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Liquiditi Group and Lunatics are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Liquiditi Group holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Lunatics holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Liquiditi Group | Lunatics | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Lunatics |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Liquiditi Group vs Lunatics
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Liquiditi Group | Lunatics |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Liquiditi Group | Lunatics |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 75 Ayer Rajah Crescent, HarbourFront, Singapore 138678 | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Bonds | NFT |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Liquiditi Group and Lunatics against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Liquiditi Group vs Lunatics
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Liquiditi Group or Lunatics?
Both Liquiditi Group and Lunatics hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Liquiditi Group maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Lunatics maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Liquiditi Group and Lunatics?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Liquiditi Group records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Lunatics at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Liquiditi Group and Lunatics differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Liquiditi Group lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex, Stocks, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Lunatics lists NFT with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Liquiditi Group or Lunatics?
Liquiditi Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Lunatics carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.