1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IGM Fore vs LIRUNEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IGM Fore (IGM Fore) and LIRUNEX (LIRUNEX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
IGM Fore and LIRUNEX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, IGM Fore holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LIRUNEX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IGM Fore | LIRUNEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | LIRUNEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | LIRUNEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | LIRUNEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IGM Fore vs LIRUNEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IGM Fore | LIRUNEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | IGM Fore | LIRUNEX |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Labuan FSA: Not suppliedCYSEC: #338/17 | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Agiou Georgiou Makri 64, ANNA MARIA LENA COURT, Flat 201, 6037 Larnaca, Cyprus | Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, MH 96960. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, English, French, German | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IGM Fore and LIRUNEX against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IGM Fore vs LIRUNEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IGM Fore or LIRUNEX?
LIRUNEX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, IGM Fore maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LIRUNEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IGM Fore and LIRUNEX?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IGM Fore records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with LIRUNEX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do IGM Fore and LIRUNEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IGM Fore lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while LIRUNEX lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IGM Fore or LIRUNEX?
IGM Fore carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LIRUNEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.