1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GIC vs QA Trading: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GIC (GIC Limited) and QA Trading (QA TRADING LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
GIC outranks QA Trading by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.8 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, GIC holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas QA Trading holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GIC | QA Trading | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.8 | 1.4 | +0.4 | GIC |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.8 | 1.4 | +0.4 | GIC |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.8 | 1.4 | +0.4 | GIC |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.8 | 1.4 | +0.4 | GIC |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GIC vs QA Trading
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GIC | QA Trading |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | GIC Limited | QA TRADING LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Bonovo Road - Fomboni Island of Mohéli - Comoros Union Jl Kol. Yos Sudarso 131 Medan, North Sumatera Indonesia 20241 | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GIC and QA Trading against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GIC vs QA Trading
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GIC or QA Trading?
Both GIC and QA Trading hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, GIC maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (MISA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas QA Trading maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MISA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GIC and QA Trading?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GIC records an Overall Score of 1.8 (Risk & Licensing: 1.8, Brand: 1.8, Market Influence: 1.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with QA Trading at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do GIC and QA Trading differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GIC lists CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while QA Trading lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GIC or QA Trading?
GIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while QA Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.