Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXGate vs LIRUNEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXGate (FXGATE Ltd) and LIRUNEX (LIRUNEX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxgate-vs-lirunex

FXGate and LIRUNEX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXGate holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LIRUNEX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXGateLIRUNEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0LIRUNEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0LIRUNEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight4.06.0+2.0LIRUNEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXGate vs LIRUNEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXGate vs LIRUNEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXGate and LIRUNEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXGateLIRUNEX
Primary Legal NameFXGATE LtdLIRUNEX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Labuan FSA: Not suppliedCYSEC: #338/17
Registered Domicile / AddressAETrust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, MH 96960.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesIndices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesArabic, Chinese, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXGate and LIRUNEX against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXGate vs LIRUNEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXGate or LIRUNEX?

LIRUNEX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, FXGate maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LIRUNEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXGate and LIRUNEX?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXGate records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with LIRUNEX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FXGate and LIRUNEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXGate lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while LIRUNEX lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXGate or LIRUNEX?

FXGate carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LIRUNEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXGate vs LIRUNEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger