1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Full Set vs SupSwap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Full Set (Full Set) and SupSwap (SupSwap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Full Set outranks SupSwap by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.5 vs 2.4)
On supervisory breadth, Full Set holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SupSwap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Full Set | SupSwap | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.5 | 2.4 | +0.1 | Full Set |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.5 | 2.4 | +0.1 | Full Set |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.4 | +0.1 | Full Set |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.3 | +0.2 | Full Set |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Full Set vs SupSwap
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Full Set | SupSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Full Set | SupSwap |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | NFT | Decentralised trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Full Set and SupSwap against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Full Set vs SupSwap
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Full Set or SupSwap?
Both Full Set and SupSwap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Full Set maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SupSwap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Full Set and SupSwap?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Full Set records an Overall Score of 2.5 (Risk & Licensing: 2.5, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with SupSwap at 2.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.4, Brand: 2.4, Market Influence: 2.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Full Set and SupSwap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Full Set lists NFT with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SupSwap lists Decentralised trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Full Set or SupSwap?
Full Set carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SupSwap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.