1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FidelisCM vs Prodigit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FidelisCM (FidelisCM) and Prodigit (Prodigit Investments Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Prodigit outranks FidelisCM by +5.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, FidelisCM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prodigit holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FidelisCM | Prodigit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | Prodigit |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | Prodigit |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Prodigit |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | Prodigit |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | Prodigit |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FidelisCM vs Prodigit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FidelisCM | Prodigit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FidelisCM | Prodigit Investments Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 52 Cybercity, 8th Floor, Ebene Tower,, Ebene | 60 Vasileos Pavlou, Agios Dometios, 2360 Nicosia, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, Russian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FidelisCM and Prodigit against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FidelisCM vs Prodigit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FidelisCM or Prodigit?
Prodigit holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FidelisCM maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SVG FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prodigit maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FidelisCM and Prodigit?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FidelisCM records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Prodigit at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FidelisCM and Prodigit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FidelisCM lists general financial services with execution software [MT4], while Prodigit lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FidelisCM or Prodigit?
FidelisCM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prodigit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.