1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
easyMarkets vs SF Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of easyMarkets (EASYMARKETS PTY LTD) and SF Capital (SF Capital Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
easyMarkets outranks SF Capital by +3.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.2)
On supervisory breadth, easyMarkets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SF Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | easyMarkets | SF Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | easyMarkets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.2 | +4.8 | easyMarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | easyMarkets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 1.2 | +5.8 | easyMarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 1.2 | +5.8 | easyMarkets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: easyMarkets vs SF Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | easyMarkets | SF Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | EASYMARKETS PTY LTD | SF Capital Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CT House,Office No.8F,Providence, Mahe, Seychelles。 | PB 1257 Bonovo Road – Fomboni Island of Moheli – Comoros Union. 100m St. Dream City, No:52, 44001, Erbil/IRAQ |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Other regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Polish, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare easyMarkets and SF Capital against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: easyMarkets vs SF Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: easyMarkets or SF Capital?
easyMarkets holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, easyMarkets maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, BVIFSC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SF Capital maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between easyMarkets and SF Capital?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), easyMarkets records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SF Capital at 1.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do easyMarkets and SF Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
easyMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5], while SF Capital lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Stocks, Currencies, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: easyMarkets or SF Capital?
easyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SF Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.