1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Global vs Invast Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Global (Decode Global Ltd) and Invast Global (Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Decode Global and Invast Global are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Global holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Invast Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Global | Invast Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Invast Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Invast Global |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Global vs Invast Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Global | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Global Ltd | Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Land # 11, Yumiwork, Lolam building, OD22/021, Kumul Hwy, Port Vila, Vanuatu | Level 27, Aurora Place, 88 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 KOYO BUILDING, 1-5-6, Higashi-Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 103-0004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies | single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, English, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Global and Invast Global against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Global vs Invast Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Global or Invast Global?
Decode Global holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Decode Global maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC, SVG FSA, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Invast Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Global and Invast Global?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Global records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Invast Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Decode Global and Invast Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Invast Global lists single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Global or Invast Global?
Decode Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Invast Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.