1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Global vs FP Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Global (Decode Global Ltd) and FP Markets (FP Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Decode Global outranks FP Markets by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Global holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FP Markets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Global | FP Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FP Markets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FP Markets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Global vs FP Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Global | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Global Ltd | FP Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Land # 11, Yumiwork, Lolam building, OD22/021, Kumul Hwy, Port Vila, Vanuatu | Abis Centre, Office 19, Providence Industrial Estate, Mahe, Seychelles F20, 1st Floor, Eden Plaza, Eden Island, Seychelles |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies | Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Bonds |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, English, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Global and FP Markets against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Global vs FP Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Global or FP Markets?
FP Markets holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 2). Specifically, Decode Global maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC, SVG FSA, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FP Markets maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (FSCA, CYSEC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Global and FP Markets?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Global records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with FP Markets at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Decode Global and FP Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while FP Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Bonds with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Global or FP Markets?
Decode Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FP Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.