Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CM Trade vs SELFTRADEINV: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CM Trade (CM Trade) and SELFTRADEINV (SELFTRADEINV) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cm-trade-vs-selftradeinv

CM Trade outranks SELFTRADEINV by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, CM Trade holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SELFTRADEINV holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCM TradeSELFTRADEINVScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.01.0+1.0CM Trade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.01.1+0.9CM Trade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.01.5+0.5CM Trade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.01.0+1.0CM Trade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CM Trade vs SELFTRADEINV

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CM Trade vs SELFTRADEINV
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CM Trade and SELFTRADEINV.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCM TradeSELFTRADEINV
Primary Legal NameCM TradeSELFTRADEINV
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressGovant Building, Kumul Highway, 1st Floor, Port Vila, VanuatuBoatmans House, 2 Selsdon Way, London, E14 9LA, United Kingdom
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesCryptocurrencies, Forex
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CM Trade and SELFTRADEINV against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CM Trade vs SELFTRADEINV

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CM Trade or SELFTRADEINV?

Both CM Trade and SELFTRADEINV hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CM Trade maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SELFTRADEINV maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CM Trade and SELFTRADEINV?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CM Trade records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SELFTRADEINV at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.1, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do CM Trade and SELFTRADEINV differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CM Trade lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while SELFTRADEINV lists Cryptocurrencies, Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CM Trade or SELFTRADEINV?

CM Trade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SELFTRADEINV carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CM Trade vs SELFTRADEINV (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger