1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Castle Rock FX vs CMX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Castle Rock FX (CR Markets, LLC) and CMX (TradeCMX Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Castle Rock FX and CMX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.5 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, Castle Rock FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CMX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Castle Rock FX | CMX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Castle Rock FX vs CMX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Castle Rock FX | CMX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CR Markets, LLC | TradeCMX Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines. | The Financial Services Centre, Stoney Ground, Kingstown VC0100, St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Castle Rock FX and CMX against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Castle Rock FX vs CMX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Castle Rock FX or CMX?
Both Castle Rock FX and CMX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Castle Rock FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CMX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Castle Rock FX and CMX?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Castle Rock FX records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with CMX at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Castle Rock FX and CMX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Castle Rock FX lists Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while CMX lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Castle Rock FX or CMX?
Castle Rock FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CMX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.