1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Cardiff vs Decode Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cardiff (Cardiff) and Decode Global (Decode Global Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Decode Global outranks Cardiff by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Cardiff holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Decode Global holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Cardiff | Decode Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Decode Global |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Decode Global |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | Decode Global |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Decode Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Decode Global |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cardiff vs Decode Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Cardiff | Decode Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Cardiff | Decode Global Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | AU | Land # 11, Yumiwork, Lolam building, OD22/021, Kumul Hwy, Port Vila, Vanuatu |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Energies | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, English, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Cardiff and Decode Global against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Cardiff vs Decode Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cardiff or Decode Global?
Decode Global holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Cardiff maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Decode Global maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC, SVG FSA, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cardiff and Decode Global?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cardiff records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Decode Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Cardiff and Decode Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Cardiff lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Decode Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cardiff or Decode Global?
Cardiff carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Decode Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.