Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BitMart vs Decode Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BitMart (BitMart) and Decode Global (Decode Global Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bitmart-vs-decode-global

BitMart and Decode Global are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, BitMart holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Decode Global holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBitMartDecode GlobalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0BitMart
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0BitMart

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BitMart vs Decode Global

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BitMart vs Decode Global
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BitMart and Decode Global.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBitMartDecode Global
Primary Legal NameBitMartDecode Global Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Addresscayman islandsLand # 11, Yumiwork, Lolam building, OD22/021, Kumul Hwy, Port Vila, Vanuatu
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment productsCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Vietnamese, English, Japanese, RussianChinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, English, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BitMart and Decode Global against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BitMart vs Decode Global

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BitMart or Decode Global?

Decode Global holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, BitMart maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Decode Global maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC, SVG FSA, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BitMart and Decode Global?

In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BitMart records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Decode Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do BitMart and Decode Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BitMart lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Decode Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BitMart or Decode Global?

BitMart carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Decode Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BitMart vs Decode Global (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | NFTVenue Ledger