1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Antfarm vs Saved Souls: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Antfarm (Antfarm) and Saved Souls (Saved Souls) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
Saved Souls outranks Antfarm by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.6 vs 2.5)
On supervisory breadth, Antfarm holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Saved Souls holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Antfarm | Saved Souls | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.5 | 2.6 | +0.1 | Saved Souls |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.5 | 2.6 | +0.1 | Saved Souls |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.6 | +0.1 | Saved Souls |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 2.6 | +0.1 | Saved Souls |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Antfarm vs Saved Souls
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Antfarm | Saved Souls |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Antfarm | Saved Souls |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Trading | NFT |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Antfarm and Saved Souls against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Antfarm vs Saved Souls
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Antfarm or Saved Souls?
Both Antfarm and Saved Souls hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Antfarm maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Saved Souls maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Antfarm and Saved Souls?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Antfarm records an Overall Score of 2.5 (Risk & Licensing: 2.5, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Saved Souls at 2.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.6, Brand: 2.6, Market Influence: 2.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Antfarm and Saved Souls differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Antfarm lists Cryptocurrencies, Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Saved Souls lists NFT with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Antfarm or Saved Souls?
Antfarm carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Saved Souls carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.