1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
4xCube vs Acala Swap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4xCube (4xCube Ltd) and Acala Swap (Acala Swap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Decentralised trading protocols, NFT marketplaces and Web3 execution venues
4xCube and Acala Swap are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, 4xCube holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Acala Swap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 4xCube | Acala Swap | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4xCube vs Acala Swap
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 4xCube | Acala Swap |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 4xCube Ltd | Acala Swap |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1st Floor, BCI House, Avarua, Rarotonga, Cook Islands | SG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency Pairs, Indices, Raw Materials, Metals, Energy, Cryptocurrencies, Stocks, Futures, Education | Decentralised trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 4xCube and Acala Swap against other regulated peers in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 4xCube vs Acala Swap
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4xCube or Acala Swap?
Both 4xCube and Acala Swap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 4xCube maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Acala Swap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4xCube and Acala Swap?
In NFTVenue Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4xCube records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Acala Swap at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 4xCube and Acala Swap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
4xCube lists Currency Pairs, Indices, Raw Materials, Metals, Energy, Cryptocurrencies, Stocks, Futures, Education with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Acala Swap lists Decentralised trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4xCube or Acala Swap?
4xCube carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Acala Swap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.