Skip to content
NFTVenue Ledger
Directory

Institution record

whitebit

Risk level not supplied5 of 5 licences marked regulated
Source score
5.0
Source exposures
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
In our coverage
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)
FVT000351RegulatedWhitebit Financial Company OÜ2020-11-24
In our coverage
Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)
Not suppliedRegulatedUAB Clear White Technologies2018
In our coverage
Czech National Bank
Not suppliedRegulatedWhiteBIT Financial Company s.r.o2021
In our coverage
Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)
Not suppliedRegulatedWhiteBIT Tech Sp. Z.o.o2021
In our coverage
Bulgarian National Bank (BNB)
Not suppliedRegulated—2022

Peer source record comparison

Compare imported fields for whitebit and other records in our decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues dataset. These are not independent audit findings.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreSource exposures
whitebit (this record)
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)CNB+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied5.00
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)
2 / 2Risk level not supplied5.00
KASFSCACNV+12
15 / 15Risk level not supplied—0
SECSecurities Investor Protection Corporation (U.S. SIPC)+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied7.30
FINRAGFSCFinancial Services Regulatory Authority, Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM FSRA)+5
6 / 8Risk level not supplied7.50
Central Bank of the UAEFMAFinancial Conduct Authority+3
6 / 6Risk level not supplied5.00

whitebit: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is whitebit's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

The imported dataset contains 5 licence entries associated with whitebit (legal entity reference: whitebit); 5 are labelled "regulated" and 5 are labelled regulated or registered: Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register) — licence FVT000351, status: regulated; Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; CNB (Czech National Bank) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB public register.

Which of whitebit's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on decentralised trading protocols, nft marketplaces and web3 execution venues. 5 of whitebit's 5 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register) (licence FVT000351, regulated, entity: Whitebit Financial Company OÜ); Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: UAB Clear White Technologies); CNB (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: WhiteBIT Financial Company s.r.o); Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) (licence Not supplied, regulated, entity: WhiteBIT Tech Sp. Z.o.o); Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) (licence Not supplied, regulated). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is whitebit's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

whitebit carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to whitebit's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with whitebit, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (whitebit.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register).

whitebit — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | NFTVenue Ledger